<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underpants on the Runway</title>
	<link>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/</link>
	<description>Funny stories and superheroes</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wonder Woman</title>
		<link>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8871</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonder Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8871</guid>
		<description>Or "she" is gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or &#8220;she&#8221; is gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mo</title>
		<link>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>Unless of course the designer of the peacock-Mexican-porn-swimming outfit is a woman, in which case we’d likely see the designer IS a fan of vaginas (both her own and those belonging to others), but lacking the cock part of the scenario.  You know, now that I think about it, I bet the designer really doesn’t like cocks at all.  This would explain why she pretended to kill the peaCOCK and turn it into a purse.  You know… all symbolic and shit.  She’s a man hater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless of course the designer of the peacock-Mexican-porn-swimming outfit is a woman, in which case we’d likely see the designer IS a fan of vaginas (both her own and those belonging to others), but lacking the cock part of the scenario.  You know, now that I think about it, I bet the designer really doesn’t like cocks at all.  This would explain why she pretended to kill the peaCOCK and turn it into a purse.  You know… all symbolic and shit.  She’s a man hater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonder Woman</title>
		<link>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8866</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonder Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8866</guid>
		<description>Ahhhh, but given the odds in the fashion industry, I bet the designer who created that peacock-Mexican-porn-swimming outfit is NOT a fan of vaginas.  Food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh, but given the odds in the fashion industry, I bet the designer who created that peacock-Mexican-porn-swimming outfit is NOT a fan of vaginas.  Food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbb</title>
		<link>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8860</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underpantsontheoutside.com/blog/2007/09/17/underpants-on-the-runway/#comment-8860</guid>
		<description>I am a fan of vaginas too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fan of vaginas too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
